analysto
Home
Analyze & Trade
AnalyzeDemo TradingTrading course
Markets & News
Market NewsCrypto
Smart Lists
Golden StocksDay Trading StocksWhat Institutions BoughtStocks at SupportTrending Stocks
Account & Support
Personal areaSupportReport issue / idea

Trade like a pro

Institutional-grade tools, live short data, institutional holdings & trading strategies.

Upgrade to Pro · $20/mo
analysto
Demo TradingProSign inSign in / Sign up
Sign up free to unlock institutional, short, analyst-target & support data — on every stock

Return on capital and the moat

The metric separating an excellent business from a merely large one, and why without a moat all profitability erodes.

The whole course

Disclosure, not advice

The strategies, scores and signals here are produced by an algorithmic system and based on technical data only. They are not investment advice or a substitute for professional advice, we are not investment advisors. Trading involves risk, and every decision and action is solely the user's responsibility.

Long-term investingLesson 27 of 344 min

Return on capital and the moat

Two companies each earn a billion a year. One invested two billion to get there, the other twenty. The first is an excellent business, the second is merely a large one. Return on capital measures that difference.

The metric

Return on invested capital is after-tax operating profit divided by the capital put into the business. It answers: how much does the company produce per dollar committed. Consistently above 15% is a strong sign of a real advantage. Below its cost of capital, the company is destroying value with every dollar it invests — even while reporting a profit.

There's also return on equity, better known and more misleading: it can be inflated simply by taking on debt. So always read it alongside leverage, and when a company is heavily levered, prefer the first metric.

The competitive moat

High returns attract competitors. If nothing stops them entering, the profitability erodes within a few years. A "moat" is exactly that something: a network effect where each new user raises the value for everyone, high switching costs that make leaving expensive, a brand that supports higher prices, a structural cost advantage, or regulation and licensing that block entry.

The practical test is historical rather than narrative: has the company held a high return for five to ten years? An advantage that survives real competition over time is a moat. One that vanishes after two years was a new-product advantage, not a structural one.

Debt

Two numbers usually suffice. Leverage: net debt divided by operating profit before depreciation — above 3 the company is rate-sensitive, above 5 it's risky. Interest coverage: operating profit divided by interest expense — under 3 there's a problem. And beyond both, check when the debt matures: a healthy company with a large repayment due next year and no cash is an entirely different story.

Terms from this lesson

תשואה על ההון המושקעReturn on Invested Capital (ROIC)
How much the company earns per dollar committed to the business. Consistently above 15% signals a moat.
תשואה על ההון העצמיReturn on Equity (ROE)
Profit divided by equity. Inflatable with debt, so read it alongside leverage.
חפיר תחרותיEconomic Moat
What stops competitors eroding profitability: network, switching costs, brand, cost or regulation.
חוב נטוNet Debt
Total debt minus the cash on hand.
כיסוי ריביתInterest Coverage
How many times operating profit covers interest expense.

Practical checklist

  • Return on invested capital above 15% over several years
  • I can state in one sentence what protects the profitability
  • Leverage under 3 and interest coverage above 3
  • I checked when the debt matures

Continue here

Next: valuation
The full glossary
Previous lessonDilution and stock-based compensationNext lessonValuation and multiples
© 2026 ANALYSTO.PRO · For research only, not investment advice.
AboutProTerms of ServiceReport issue / ideaSupportAccessibility statementStatus
רווח לפני ריבית מס ופחתEBITDA
Operating profitability before depreciation. Useful for comparison, but it ignores real investment.